[Moon] call3.txt why?

[Dimitris Vitorakis]

Perhaps you want to visit http://users.skynet.be/on7eh/EME.htm  mid way 
through the page to see if we make ''entries in our database''?
There is the example of SV1BTR cw EME QSO with OO7EH.
12el+250w on random, fully unknown callsign.
I run 21.5dbd on 2m, 0.3db more gain than you run. My 2m preamp is in shack 
and i lose 0.9db of Sun noise so that makes your RX & operational ability 
supposedly even better. What is the smallest station you have worked on cw 
random, new to EME callsign?
Since than i have worked Michel other times on random also under the call 
ON7EH. It has always been equally difficult.
Why don't you and all capable stations try to work Michel on cw random and 
then discuss about ''entries in our database''?

In all Contests myself and many others exchange RST for the majority of our 
QSOs. This is fully unknown information. In EU EME Contest for example  - 
unlike ARRL where no log os being checked and no disqualifications even for 
those violating the rules through their active logger presence or breaking 
of Assisted class definition as to some or someone this is a very minor 
thing.... - all logs are being checked. How come there are no mistakes and 
unknown information is being exchanged fully and repeatedly?

Speaking about percentages Joe, why don't you give us the percentages of 
expetion DXCC's using single or 2 small yagis (the majority) and 150-200w 
being worked with Deep Search since its inception, instead of putting 95% 
for JW5E who, i have heard, has a bigger in terms of erp, setup?
If we put down the callsigns and the relevant setup they used, you will see 
your statement of 95% does not apply at all, as a whole.
Therefore i suggest that next time if you make such a statement you present 
an overall, not an isolated, picture.

Final: since you know that Wolfang DL5MAE et al would never, ever, make any 
use of that information in his QSO attempt as you write, then why do you 
make the analogy of jt65 DS to cw, if not to influence readers to draw wrong 
conclusions?

73
Jimmy SV1BTR

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Taylor" <joe at Princeton.EDU>
To: <moon at moonbounce.info>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 3:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Moon] call3.txt why?


> Hi Wolfgang and all,
>
> DL5MAE wrote:
>> Excuse me, but I really dont understand why we must enter a "new 
>> callsign"
>> in a data-base to work them? Whats the reason?
>
> 1. There is no need to do so, and for 95% of the stations who work JW5E
> using JT65 it will make absolutely no difference whether you do, or do 
> not.
>
> 2. If you will be aiming to work JW5E with an ear-and-brain mode, you
> have already made the equivalent "entry" in your database.  (Of course,
> I know that you would never, ever, make any use of that information
> during your QSO attempt.)
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon mailing list
> Moon at moonbounce.info
> http://www.moonbounce.info/mailman/listinfo/moon
>
> Please enter/update your standings:
> http://www.vhf-dx.net/top.html
>
> When you decide to remain anonymous I may consider this unpolite and 
> remove you from the list
>