[Moon] wsjt-cw

[Håkan Harrysson]

Hello   Kenny and all on the list.



I am not sure that i am right in my thinking but i think the 
proffesionals work with  FEC  (Forward error correction) and recreates 
missing pieces in a message sent. (deep space?)


After much thinking have i come to the standing that the deep search 
thing does the same.  It recreates callsigns that are not transmitted 
over the radiopath but the clever programme can figure out what is 
transmitted anyway with the help of the call3 data base or information 
written in by the user  during qso


As i see it this should not have come into the hobby in any other way 
then experimentation and should not have anything with claimed DXCC and 
awards as the deep search qso is not a complete QSO from my 
requirements.

I could almost (not so deep as deep search) do the same with CW and 
the waterfall as i can easily see signals much deeper then i can decode 
by ear.  I choose not to receive the report until i hear it by ear of 
course.



Also all this exchanging of information in chatroom during ongoing QSO 
have made me decide that worked DXCC and awards using deep search just 
passes by without notice.

I think it is time to go separate ways as  Deep search / CW people 
have nothing in common. Let the moon-net be a deep search EME list and 
MOON a CW EME list. 

I want also to take the time to thankyou guys who have the time and 
strength to question new things.  Very good!.


73 de Hakan  SM7WSJ








That we are way behind the professionals ?? 
True in the aspect that some of use claim to receive and decode data 
that
isn't there or at least not completely received . 
I don't think professionals are working that way ! 

73
Kenny ON4DPX