[Moon] ARRL contest rules

[Darrell]

Hi Peter;
I could not agree more, I looked at the DUBUS Rules and Classes last 
year, and in fact suggest at that time that ARRL should look at them 
as well.  You do not have to be a Philadelphia Lawyer to understand them.
Very clear and none of this *please refer* to article ???? that may 
have been 3 pages back in the ARRL Document, and even then try to 
find the marriage between the 2 or 3 reference made......total 
nonsense, this is a Hobby and lets keep it that way, and stop 
muddling the thing up to the point of NO understanding.

Regards, Darrell

At 02:44 PM 4/16/2008, peter blair wrote:
>The ARRL editor Ward Silver, N0AX, in his opening comment  on the 
>results  ( see 
><http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/2007/EME/>http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/2007/EME/ 
>) suggests that the community takes a look at the DUBUS EME contest 
>classes. I can't recall seeing on these reflectors any violent 
>dissagreement with the rules of the DUBUS contest  ( which are 
>at  <http://www.dubus.org/>http://www.dubus.org/ and then go to EME pages)
>  Are there any reasons ( apart from NIH) why the ARRL contest could 
> not use the same set of classes and rules?
>73 Peter G3LTF
>_______________________________________________
>Moon mailing list
>Moon at moonbounce.info
>http://www.moonbounce.info/mailman/listinfo/moon
>
>  Please enter/update your standings:
>  http://www.vhf-dx.net/top.html
>
>  When you decide to remain anonymous I may consider this unpolite 
> and remove you from the list
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.0/1381 - Release Date: 
>4/16/2008 9:34 AM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.moonbounce.info/pipermail/moon/attachments/20080416/a87f5041/attachment.htm