[Moon] another question abt 3XT1

[DF2ZC]

Hmmm...did I miss out on something, Lars? Isn't this exactly the same as in
the old HSCW days where I do not recall inserting blanks between callsigns?
73 Bernd 

BTW My sincere congratulations for the first nearly constructive (and no
longer insulting) comment from you I have seen the past months (or at all?)

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Pettersson [mailto:sm4ive at telia.com] 
Sent: Dienstag, 6. November 2007 17:41
To: DF2ZC; moon at moonbounce.info
Subject: Re: [Moon] another question abt 3XT1

Yes but exactly as you type the calls Bernd. One have to know before what
the calls are, If it was a random QSO you have not a clue what the callsign
should be, Fantastic is`nt it?
Its much easier with CW  one could hear the paus between the calls :~))
73 de Lars SM4IVE

----- Original Message -----
From: "DF2ZC" <df2zc at gmx.de>
To: <moon at moonbounce.info>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Moon] another question abt 3XT1


> They will be zero, Wolfgang, if exactly this construction is being used 
> with
> the the "/" and the space between the callsigns. However "3XT1PJ4PA3CNX"
> would work since it is 13 characters only. It is almost like in the old 
> days
> when your keyer memory had a particular size only and you had to try what 
> is
> possible to make the callsigns fit in.
>
> There are more possibilities for a valid callsign exchange to work which
> extend the time of the QSO exchange and still comply with QSO rules.
>
> vy 73 Bernd DF2ZC (JO30RN)
> www.df2zc.de
>
> ____________________________________________
> 144 MHz EME NewsLetter:
> www.df2zc.de/newsletter
>
> 144 MHz DXCC #21
> 144 MHz WAC
>
> Kenwood TS 2000
> 2 x GU74b by LZ2US
> 4 x 2M18XXX 21 dBd full elevation
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moon-bounces at moonbounce.info [mailto:moon-bounces at moonbounce.info] 
> On
> Behalf Of dl5mae at wa7v.ampr.org
> Sent: Dienstag, 6. November 2007 16:03
> To: moon at moonbounce.info
> Subject: Re: [Moon] another question abt 3XT1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> K1JT wrote:
>>A JT65 plain-text message is truncated for only one reason: if the
>>transmitting operator tries to send a message with more than 13
>>characters, only the first 13 will be sent.
>
>
> I am not sure, but what are the chances for i.e. PJ4/PA3CNX to work 3XT1 
> ??
>
> vy 73 de dl5mae Wolfgang
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon mailing list
> Moon at moonbounce.info
> http://www.moonbounce.info/mailman/listinfo/moon
>
> Please enter/update your standings:
> http://www.vhf-dx.net/top.html
>
> When you decide to remain anonymous I may consider this unpolite and 
> remove
> you from the list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moon mailing list
> Moon at moonbounce.info
> http://www.moonbounce.info/mailman/listinfo/moon
>
> Please enter/update your standings:
> http://www.vhf-dx.net/top.html
>
> When you decide to remain anonymous I may consider this unpolite and 
> remove you from the list