[Moon] why are some JT65-users still not working along IARU procedure?

[MMMonVHF]

dl5mae at wa7v.ampr.org schrieb:
> Dear friends, 
> 
> I followed a discussion on N0UK this afternoon. 
> I thought in Vienna the EME-QSO-rules were discussed and everybody  
> now working along this procedure. Most surprising was what I saw on chat. 
> Also, ZB2/DF2ZC said: WE DO NOT ACCEPT TRUNCATED CALLSIGNS SUCH AS
> ZBDF2ZC OR TRUNCATED SUFFIXES OF YOUR OWN CALLSIGN! ....



Just receive this mail from Bernd, ZB2/DF2ZC, who wants us, to spread
it as an answer to the above comment - PLEASE any further discussion
you might place to his personal mail-adress! He will be back mid of
these week...



Dear Guido,

Would you kindly forward this to Moon-Net? Thank you!

73 Bernd DF2ZC






Fellow EME-Friends,

It makes me really angry how some people once again express an opinion 
on JT65 QSOs made without knowing the real facts and in this case allege 
ME of not working according the rules.

To cut a long story short:
(1) We have received ALL reqired information from every station we worked.
(2) Some guys who had problems with setting their software properly sent 
their own call-sign only AFTER they had sent mine and theirs truncated. 
So in this case we did receive both callsigns BEFORE we sent a report! 
An example: Sequence 1 I rx "zb2/df2zc dl8" and the following sequence I 
receive "dl8yhr". After this I may send reports, yes?

(3) We could have made many more QSOs if we had accepted truncated 
call-signs. We didn´t, of course. As a result some stations had to wait 
three days until they finally sent the correct information and we made 
the contact. Some others didn´t make a QSO at all though they were good 
sigs here.

So, would the originator of this allegation please tell the community 
who I worked sending his callsign only? By Sunday 29 April 12z. If it 
should be impossible to proof this then the originator should at least 
publicly state that he couldn´t and in future keep his mouth shut or his 
fingers away from the keyboard instead of writing such rubbish.  I´m 
very much looking forward to the hard proofs of incorrect contacts.

73 Bernd DF2ZC, Frank DH7FB